Showing posts with label cynicism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cynicism. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Who's Laughing Now?


"I submitted the budget today to Congress -- it's on a laptop notebook, an e-budget. It saves paper, saves trees, saves money. I think it's the first budget submitted electronically. And it's a good budget. It's a budget that achieves some important objectives. One, it understands our top priority is to defend our country, so we fund our military, as well as fund the homeland security. Secondly, the budget keeps our economy growing." — President Bush, Cabinet Meeting, February 4

The New York Times published an article today
revealing that the Iraqi government expects a surplus as large as $79 billion for its 2008 budget.

www.thewhitehouse.gov projects the 2008 budget deficit to be $389 billion in a mid-session review of fiscal year 2009. The site assures us that the budget "Introduces a new culture of accountability on wasteful earmarks."

Which brings us back to the Times article, and what it tells us about Iraq's surplus:

The figures could be used to argue that because the Iraqi ministries still do not have the capacity to spend their own money, further assistance from the United States is called for, Ms. Alexander said. Or the huge oil revenues could be seen as proof that Iraq has the resources to solve its own problems if it would only use the money.
And in an even more ridiculous twist, the United States has payed Iraq at least $435.6 million in interest on the money because it is held in the Federal Reserve Bank.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Let's Try This Again...

The City of Seattle has put its five automated public toilets up for auction again after the first round received no bids. The minimum bid has changed too — from $89,000 to a mere 99 cents with a $2.50 minimum increase.

The bidding could turn out to be a popularity contest, which toilet do people desire the most? Bidadoo Auctions has even uploaded dozens of high-resolution photos to entice the reluctant toilet fancier.

The standings are:


**CITY OF SEATTLE - APT #1 - PIKE PLACE MARKET**
This seller accepts PayPal
13 Bids
$205.38
Not specified
9d 1h 49m
**CITY OF SEATTLE - APT #3 - PIONEER SQUARE**
This seller accepts PayPal
7 Bids
$112.72
Not specified
9d 1h 46m
**CITY OF SEATTLE - APT #2 - ELLIOT BAY WATERFRONT**
This seller accepts PayPal
9 Bids
$105.83
Not specified
9d 1h 44m
**CITY OF SEATTLE - APT #4 - INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT**
This seller accepts PayPal
5 Bids
$102.50
Not specified
9d 1h 47m
**CITY OF SEATTLE - APT #5 - CAPITOL HILL**
This seller accepts PayPal
12 Bids
$100.00
Not specified
9d 1h 42m

Friday, August 1, 2008

Behind Deadline?

As far back as May 28, the Capitol Hill Chamber of Commerce was supposed to have submitted a report to the City Council's Cultural Overlay District Advisory Committee that would "inform [the committee's] process for establishing the City’s first Cultural Overlay District," according to the committee's Web site.

But neither the committee's Web site nor the Chamber's Web site has a copy. As of two weeks ago, Dennis Sellin of Lunde Consulting, the company hired to facilitate the committee, had never seen the report or heard its status.

Is it possible that the Chamber is still working on it? This Craigslist ad, posted July 30 suggests so:


Clickable

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Repeat Offense

Click to examine.

Bellevue, 520, Microsoft, oh my!

Is it too much to ask that they just rename them The Eastside Times and The Eastside Post-Intelligencer?

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Twins!

twins.JPG

It's no secret that The Seattle Times and the PI are joined at the hip — literally and figuratively — but yesterday's front pages just screamed out for comparison.

Like here, onn the left, the PI: "Court nixes county's land use limits.

And on the right, the Times: "Court says rural-land restrictions go too far."


Yes, they are on opposite sides of the paper, but they are actually about the same ruling.

Both papers also feature housing costs as their big issue — no surprise, considering that they cater to a solid middle-class readership. But it really is too much when they both cite Windermere in their battling coverage.

Combined, the two papers ran 27 articles referencing "mortgage"— in just one day.

Guys, why delay the inevitable? Just merge them already.